• sparklepower@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    interesting. so they already signed statements admitting to blocking traffic and affecting local businesses, therefore they’re arguing that those testimonies are not necessary. basically this is the equivalent of, “we already admitted it, can’t we just move on?”

    IMO the court should still hear the victims’ impact statements. i hope the judge thinks so too.