starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoAnon discovers .NETprogramming.devimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down15
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAnon discovers .NETprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareanus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 months ago pervasive unchecked nullability Framework management is hell, fat binaries inconvenient and not default No option monad in the standard lib Cross version dependencies simply don’t work in some contexts Compiler output only marginally better than working with c++ At least it doesn’t have Gradle.
minus-squareඞmir@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months ago pervasive unchecked nullability Addressed nowadays with the question mark and exclamation mark syntax, and programming without nullability is a pain Framework management is hell, fat binaries inconvenient and not default Nuget? Compiler output only marginally better than working with c++ No one claims it’s faster at runtime than good C++, it’s just a lot easier to write decent code
At least it doesn’t have Gradle.
Addressed nowadays with the question mark and exclamation mark syntax, and programming without nullability is a pain
Nuget?
No one claims it’s faster at runtime than good C++, it’s just a lot easier to write decent code