• tobogganablaze
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    My point is: How can you be so sure it has been dismissed?

    Models that don’t work should be dismissed. If you have a model for shrinkage that does work it should not be dismissed.

    It appears, the SM doesn’t disagree with shrinkage at all.

    Yup, pretty much.

    But why does it seem your mind being blown by this idea? Maybe be because you didn’t consider us being sucked in anywhere? If that’s the case, here’s why didn’t you consider this yet: I didn’t yet post my post despite the probability of not having a new thought.

    Sorry, I’m not following. My mind is definitly NOT blown and black holes don’t “suck in” things. That’s a common misconception. And I really don’t know what you’re trying to say with the sentences after that.

    Your unfriendliness could just have hurt a kid’s interest into space. Remember that.

    I’m sorry that you think I was unfriendly.

    But this a community for people that smoked too much weed to saything dumb things that sound clever when you don’t think about them too much.

    If there is actual kids around that are interested in space theneven more important that unscientific non-sense gets called out.

    [1] https://www.science20.com/hammock_physicist/universe_expanding_or_are_we_shrinking-118673

    Quite interesting article, you should read it.

    But the TL;DR here is that so far all “shrinking gravity” models had major flaws and didn’t work. And the last idea of perfeclty scaling atoms is unobservable, so really more of a thought expriment than an actual model.