• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bespoke:

    Guillotine economics

    You behead the ultra-rich (I’m thinking hectomillionaires and above) and all of their worst enablers and then divide their resources between those that need them the most, with anything too big for one person to own becoming public property.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      Can we at least give them the chance to willingly forfeit their extreme wealth before resorting to decapitation. I imagine many would still refuse, but I feel it’s ethically necessary to provide them with a choice.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Sure. Everything that’s happened since the industrial revolution if not earlier says they’re not going to, but fair’s fair I guess 🤷

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Alright. Well give then time equal to the time local labour laws allow for firing.

        So for instance US at-will states, no warning for the rich. In countries with better labour laws, it will be longer.

        Anyone billionaire pretending they don’t know the Earth is fucked because of a system in which like them can exist is just feigning ignorance.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re thinking octo. Hectomillionaire is 100 millions which, while less than a thousandth of what the two richest in the world have, is still resource hoarding obscene enough to be inherently detrimental to society as a whole.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have a friend who’s pretty wealthy and they feel pretty guilty about it. They’re looking at buying a house, spending the vast majority of their inherited wealth in the process. My belief is that whilst being able to do this is in a huge level of privilege, they’re much more likely to be dining than on the menu at an “eat the rich” party. And honestly, that baffles me somewhat — it highlights just how obscenely wealthy the ultra rich are if my wealthy friend is nowhere in the same ballpark

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Speaking softly doesn’t really work in a misinformation overload world, though, so let’s only follow half of his advice 😁

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Honestly I’ll take the blood as payment.

    Keep that shit in a bag as a trophy on my top shelf.

    Write “Fucked around and found out” on it.

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Trickle down economics works perfectly fine. It’s just that billionaires are subhuman and so are further down than the rest of us.