from the passcodes-ftw dept

  • PirateJesus@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The right to not surrender a pass code has actually not yet been decided. We already have differences between regions.

    • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s protected under the fifth. Even so, requiring a warrant to get your passcode is far better than not requiring a warrant to demand biometrics. Either way you slice it, passcode > biometrics.

      • PirateJesus@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        SCOTUS has not yet decided that a password in your brain is protected by the fifth.

        Your phone is protected by the fifth.

        Until SCOTUS decides that passwords are protected by the fifth, you can be held in contempt of court by a judge indefinitely because you forgot the password (theoretical scenario, has not yet happened).

        • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          There have been instances where judges ruled in favor of them being protected which sets a legal precedent. The SCOTUS probably won’t get involved unless a major lawsuit or federal-level case occurs.

          Either way, passcodes are superior. Not sure why you’re arguing this.