A community for taking a critical look at pseudoscience, quackery, and
bald-faced BS. “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” ~ David Hume
Things we like:
• Thoughtful discussion
• Humor
• Civility
Things we don’t like quite so much: • Trolling
• Low-effort comments and posts
• Personal attacks
• Spam
• URL shorteners
Carl Sagan’s Nine Precepts of Skeptical Thinking:
1. Confirm the reality (independent of the status quo). 2. Encourage debate on
the evidence by proponents of all points of view.
3. Avoid appeals to authority.
4. Recognize that there is always more than one hypothesis.
5. Do not cling to a hypothesis simply because it is yours.
6. Attaching a numerical quantity is key to discriminating hypotheses.
7. In a chain of argument, all the links must work—not just most of them.
8. Everything else being equal, the simplest explanation is the most likely.
9. Proposals that cannot be proven or shown to be false do not have much
scientific value.
Suggested Fediverse Communities • RFK Jr. Watch @lemm.ee
[https://lemm.ee/c/rfk_jr_watch] - Tackling misinformation being spread by
antivaxxer politician, Robert F Kennedy Jr.
• DebunkThis @lemmy.world [https://lemmy.world/c/debunkthis] - an evidence-based
community for debunking misinformation and dubious claims.
Hey, all.
If you’re someone who likes to think critically about extraordinary claims and outlandish statements being made online or in the news, come hang out with us at !skeptic@lemmy.world
You can’t have critical takes on quackery without quackery, so I think quacks should be welcomed as long as they refrain from the things we don’t like list. Just as would be the case for the critical thinkers. I’m not saying this is the case, but it is how I would like it.
You can’t have critical takes on quackery without quackery, so I think quacks should be welcomed as long as they refrain from the things we don’t like list. Just as would be the case for the critical thinkers. I’m not saying this is the case, but it is how I would like it.