When they said Reddit has 2000 employees I was shocked. what could they possibly do onto a website that is basically run by users (and sysadmins) and that is basically feature-wise mature? I really can’t figure out 2000 people working every day on Reddit… on what? just for a quick comparison, the whole IAmA was run by a single person (Victoria), so… what are they doing?

    • ConditionOverload@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And your app is still 100x better than theirs even with all their resources. To think the CEO gets pissed off that users prefer yours over theirs even though they have no reason to make an app that bad.

      • Corhen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But he doesn’t have to add things like NFT and Avatar support… Which is promptly forgotten when the next big thing comes along.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you ever worked in a corporate environment?

      It’s basically friction losses with occasional sparks of actual productivity.

      BTW: I’ve been using sync for years. I hope you can find a way to salvage some of your work.

    • shapis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wondering. Given a team of 50 people. Do you think your app would have been better or worse ?

  • AB7ORH7D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And yet Apollo was made by one guy and it’s far better than anything Reddit made

  • Vaggumon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d wager a lot of them are looking for new jobs. Those who aren’t are probably making dumpster s’mores.

  • akaifox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It will be like where I was working. On that project there were ~12 people. You could’ve cut in in half easily:

    • AFAIK the project manager did nothing but create meetings (tbh they had no clue what they were doing)
    • The QA was incompetent and instead I wrote all their tests and taught the junior dev so he could too
    • 2 User Researchers set up various sessions – but the business told them all their findings were wrong (turns out the researchers were right)
    • Architect went to some meetings and never spoke to the devs about anything (turns out they were responsible for multiple projects at once, which obviously makes things hard)
    • The Lead Developer seemed to be on holiday every other day, dealing with some personal issue, or in meetings
    • One Dev was fresh out of a scheme (for non comp sci students, so was slow but that’s understandable)

    I ended up working overtime into burn out to get the project through the door (and hit issues due the architect should’ve informed us of). It would’ve honestly been easier as just me, one other developer, and a BA