• 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 months ago

    Liberals support this idea of Israel belonging to Jews 2k years ago or something and that justifies taking the land from Palestinians. This land was Mexico less than 300 years ago. So I’m sure they would support this as well.

    • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Especially with the tradition to give land ownership to the people who first discovered it, the land thief by European immigrants which are illegal even under the European laws, the continued imprisonment of Indigenous people in dangerous barren federal reserve concentration camps until the prisoners surrender all the fruit of their labor, the current chemical attacks against Indigenous people in concentration camps, the inability to achieve promise to provide all the living necessities to imprisoned people in concentration camps, the Indian Residential fake school Holocaust that became the Nazi Holocaust, the inheritance thief of abducted or murdered children under the fake cultural assimilation project, the misuse of Indigenous parents’ funding in the Indian Residential fake schools under the promise to make the enslaved children into elites of European immigrant society, and the inability to provided reparation due to mismanagement by authoritarian corrupted European immigrant officers.

  • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    The states need new names then. We can call Nevada Norte California, Arizona can be Este California, Utah is Puta, and New Mexico will become Nuevo Nuevo Mexico.

    • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or just leave the Indian names as they are because that’s in some cases literally the only remaining indication of the original inhabitants of that land, sadly.

  • SadArtemis🏳️‍⚧️@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    In the future, after a US collapse? If it’s not going to the indigenous peoples (which is the most ideal situation), definitely. Mexico, while a colonial state, at least seems likely to have the perks of being majority of indigenous descent (Mestizo), and also having the demographic strength to deal with and suppress whatever troublesome Yanks are squatting on that land.

  • Kirbywithwhip1987@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    BUT also make it full with all of Oklahoma, Kansas and Wyoming, borders of states will need to change after being reincorporated and the rest of USA states should become some kind of United Indigenous republic with the exception of Hawaii which will obviously be independent along with Puerto Rico, Guam and the rest of the non-State occupied islands.

    So basically 10 states back to Mexico and the rest of the continental ones united into Indigenous republic along with all Canadian Provinces. Everyone can stay after except reactionary white yanks. But that will obviously have to wait until USA collapses, Mexico can’t do it currently.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    It would be the compassionate solution and give the people in the illegally occupied parts of Mexico a chance to uplift themselves.

  • KrupskayaPraxis@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I personally don’t think they should get everything back, but I think that getting some back is feasible. like the territory of the Gadsden Purchase (except for Tucson). And parts of rural Southern California as well.

  • Catradora-Stalinism☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean if its a choice between America owning it and Mexico owning it, then definitely mexico

    but i’d rather have the land given back to the native tribes