Hungarian leader praised Republican front-runner as a “man of peace.”

Hungarian leader praised Republican front-runner as a “man of peace.”

Donald Trump will totally stop funding Ukraine if he wins the U.S. election in November, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said following a meeting between the right-wing figureheads.

“He will not give a penny in the Ukraine-Russia war,” Orbán told Hungarian state media Sunday. “Therefore, the war will end, because it is obvious that Ukraine can not stand on its own feet.”

The longtime allies met last Friday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, a summit which was lambasted by U.S. President Joe Biden.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    44·
    8 months ago

    he’s trying to take a small sliver of Ukraine which voted to secede from Ukraine

    He just wants access to the port in Sevastopol, he just wants Crimea, he just wants a bit of Eastern Ukraine…

    Peace in our time!

    • cynar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      121·
      8 months ago

      While Chamberlain was applying appeasement, he was also rapidly upgrading the UK’s military capability.

      He then fell on his own (proverbial) sword, to let Churchill take power.

      Don’t compare these Muppets to a politician who actually did what he could to slow the wolves down enough to fight back.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        6·
        8 months ago

        You are quite right to raise this point.

        Relevant wikipedia article for those who are unaware:

        Public opinion in Britain throughout the 1930s was frightened by the prospect of German terror bombing of British cities, which had started during the First World War. The media emphasised the dangers, and the general consensus was that defence was impossible and, as Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin had said in 1932, “The bomber will always get through”. However, the Royal Air Force had two major weapons systems in the works: better interceptors (Hurricanes and Spitfires) and especially radar. They promised to counter the German bombing offensive but were not yet ready and so appeasement was necessary to cause a delay. Specifically, regarding the fighters, the RAF warned the government in October 1938 that the German Luftwaffe bombers would probably get through: “the situation… will be definitely unsatisfactory throughout the next twelve months”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement

        The whole article is worth a read. TLDR: Chamberlain’s legacy and foreign policy has been (partially) re-evaluated.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          4·
          8 months ago

          Might be worth remembering that while Tories like Chamberlain were busy appeasing Hitler’s Germany, they were significantly less dovish towards Lenin’s Russia.

          British Tories endorsed the White Army in its war to reclaim Moscow, following the 1917 revolution. Brits participated in the blockade of Russian ports and harassment of their officials through the collapse of the Tory government in 1921. And the Brits, with Churchill as their Chancellor of the Exchequer, conducted a kind of Cold War with the Soviets well into the 1930s. The Munich Agreement was, at least in part, an effort to contain the Communists of Czechoslovak Sudetenland.

          So much of the Western treatment towards the Germans during the 30s was, at its heart, a response to the failures of the Romanov Government at the end of WW1. And there was significant speculation - particularly with the Soviet economic boom of pre-WW2 era - that they’d be the Big Bad all the western powers were going to have to rally against. So Germany was - both directly by US business and indirectly by British appeasement - propped up as a regional counterweight.