• -V0lD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit

          • ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I hate wireless charging too, though. It’s inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it’s plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

            Glass isn’t mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation.

              • ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                That’s why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I’m wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy.

                • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it’s now wasted both of our time :)

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging.

          So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn’t “premium” enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile