If you actually knew what you were talking about you’d know the consumer reports report referenced in the article weighs cosmetic issues as heavily as mechanical ones. It’s been talked about to death since it came out a while ago but yeah, nice yahoo link, bro.
Oh, no!
Anyways…
When you think a meme absolves you from being a credulous and gullible consumer in denial about sunk-cost fallacy.
https://news.yahoo.com/tesla-makes-least-reliable-cars-133500819.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tesla-car-battery-fire-needed-6000-gallons-water-to-extinguish-rcna68153
If you actually knew what you were talking about you’d know the consumer reports report referenced in the article weighs cosmetic issues as heavily as mechanical ones. It’s been talked about to death since it came out a while ago but yeah, nice yahoo link, bro.
Any source that makes you feel a hint of buyer’s remorse is a bad source.
I really feel sorry for the level of sunk-cost fallacy you’ve sunken to, all so your bazingamobile doesn’t seem like a bad choice.
Imagine thinking there’s wiggle room for a ton of major cosmetic problems on a product that costs a full year of an average worker’s income.
A ton?
The fucking body panels don’t even fit correctly.
Occasionally a Tesla will be delivered with a body panel that isn’t aligned appropriately. It is promptly aligned at no cost to the owner.
Again… a ton? Or are you just complaining about something you actually have no experience with just because you hate cars and hate Musk?