• gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even medium human writers can comprehend their work as a whole, though

    Sure, but a lot of humans are rather bad writers.

    but any company going full LLM isn’t looking for quality.

    That is true for 24h news cycle of online media, regardless LLM.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but a lot of humans are rather bad writers.

      Bad writing is still a step above rng junk, imo.

      but any company going full LLM isn’t looking for quality.

      That is true for 24h news cycle of online media, regardless LLM.

      Yes, that was my point. Setting up your company to put out more content than can possibly be processed by humans is a glaring sign of their values - ie quantity far above quality.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bad writing is still a step above rng junk, imo.

        I’v read writing worse than GTP. I had to help someone write an essay - and I just wrote it for him in the end, because he absolutely lacked the skills to write a long meaningful text. At at the same time - genius of a percussionist.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think that person was signing up for jobs writing for blogs or content farms?

          • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you read some low quality journalism? The whole yellow press can be replaced with GTP and no one would ever see a difference.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, so do you wanna talk about your terrible writing partner in school? Or “yellow press”? Or maybe the topic of the article, which isn’t journalism in the slightest? Or how about my point, which was, again, that even bad writers have context, as opposed to an LLM which is just filling in the arbitrary patterns it’s programmed to delineate. Readability is not what I’m talking about.