A recently released Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) document titled “Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide”* links common protest symbols to “terrorism” — another marker in a common theme of conflating militant protest for social justice with deadly terrorist violence within the United States. Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Brennan Center have raised warnings about such documents, citing inadequate protections for people’s constitutional rights.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a liberal gun owner, I agree.

    I want a world without mass shootings.

    But right now, the majority of mass shootings happen against the most vulnerable people. And the majority of hate crimes is happening because a bunch of fucktards are pushing violent messages. And the worst part is nobody in power really gives a shit.

    • SirStumps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was growing up in school there was only one mass shooting at the time and that was Columbine. Kids would drive to school with guns in their racks because they planned on hunting later. The notion to shoot people wasn’t even a consideration. What we have isn’t a gun issue, we have a mental health crisis like nothing we have seen before and we are far too unequipped to handle it. We need better mental health programs and ways for people to more easily use them from a young age.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Columbine shooters did not use hunting guns. We have better access to mental health care than in the past. We also have greater access to more deadly guns. Countries with strong gun control do not have our problem with mass shootings. Implementing strong gun control has been proven to stop mass shootings. A lot of money has been spent by arms dealers to convince you the the problem is your fellow humans, and not the largely unregulated flow of machines of death supplied for capitalist profit.

        Should we have better access to mental healthcare, and intervention programs? Sure. Funny, though, how the people insisting it’s all about mental illness and not about the gun profiteers also usually oppose any public spending on mental healthcare as well.

        • SirStumps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean the problem is my fellow human. AI hasn’t picked up a gun and shot up a school as far as I know.

          I am for more efforts to provide mental health care for low income people’s and it should be free.

          There are attempts at brain washing on both sides depending on the agenda.

          I can agree that military style fire arms do not need to be in the hands of ordinary civilians that haven’t undergone training in weapon safety. I believe it should be required to have yearly training on weapon safety for all fire arms.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are attempts at brain washing on both sides depending on the agenda.

            The problem with this “both sides” bullshit is that leftist critique is nearly always targeted at systems, as opposed to reactionary ‘brainwashing’ is targeted at minorities

            A “radical leftist” isn’t out to murder anyone, they’re out to disrupt the system. As far as I’m concerned, the problem is almost entirely a reactionary politics problem, not a problem of firearm training and not even one of mental health (though they are contributing factors(

            Don’t conflate libratory movements with reactionary terrorism

            • SirStumps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am honestly loving your take on the subject. It actually made me think a little about what you are saying and the fact you are very respectful in your wording is wonderful.

              Can you explain reactionary brainwashing of minorities a bit further?

              Many far leftists I have run into have been very controversial or just plain rude so having someone speak plainly and respectfully is a nice change of pace.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I find your lack of irony refreshing, too.

                I’m confused by your question though, can you clarify your choice of using the word ‘of’ in the question “brainwashing of minorities”?

                It’s so rare to run into a reactionary conservative that’s so curious about left-leaning politics, thank you for your curiosity

                • SirStumps@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I try to keep my perspective unbiased which is difficult because I am human after all. When conversing with someone that brings up interesting perspectives and does not devolve to name calling I try to speak with them further because those are the ones who’s reasoning skills tend to be more developed and make for better conversations over all.

                  From how I understood what you were saying, there is a reactionary brainwashing of sorts. Perhaps I was incorrect in my belief that you meant of minorities specifically. I may have read it incorrectly.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Thanks for acknowledging your imperfect interpretation.

                    I used scarequotes in the phrase you are referencing, perhaps that is where your confusion is stemming from? Brainwashing was used in your comment, I was simply making a reference to your usage.

                    The point: reactionary politics identifies the “outsider” as the subject of opposition. Radical leftist politics identifies oppressive systems as the subject of opposition.

                    Hence: the use of firearms by one group is simply not comparable to the use by the other.

                    Hopefully that clarifies things for you.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            There are attempts at brain washing on both sides depending on the agenda.

            Such as? Where is this (supposed) “leftist” brain-washing machine supposed to be at?

            • SirStumps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              It often pops up in opinion pieces or news articles just like any other propaganda mean to influence your opinions.

          • kaffiene@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Pretty much the entire rest of the world thinks that the US gun lobby is batshit insane. Have real been brainwashed?

            • SirStumps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The rest of the world can do whatever they want.

              “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” -Benjamin Franklin

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Your glib response and cute little quote doesn’t actually answer the question I asked. Possibly because you don’t have a good answer

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        we have a gun issue and a mental health issue.

        There are a LOT of people in America that own, or have easy access to fire arms, that shouldnt be allowed within 2 miles of one.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is an inadequate summation I am afraid. Most of the world right now is experiencing a mental health crisis. A lot of the countries with similar populations and cultures to the US with primarily English speaking approximations - Australia, UK, Canada and the nordic nations… All of them are experiencing massive mental health and economic issues on a systemic level. There is something unique to the United States… The guns. Not just the lack of public safety measures to control guns but the culture of entitlement to weaponry and maintaining the fantasy of utilizing them against other humans in some sort of nebulous future extralegal event when some sort of universal concensus is reached that war is declared on the US government by it’s rag tag highly individualist citizenry.

        Unfortunately you cannot divorce the mental health issue from the gun issue in the States but neither can you solve the issue without actually addressing that guns at that level of saturation are a nightmare that causes a unique presentation of crisis. Calling for it to be addressed strictly as a mental health issue will go no where… And it’s designed to go no where because as long as we are having this debate of whether it’s a gun or a mental health problem neither get addressed… And quite frankly there are simply not enough mental health professionals in the field to address that demand. The burnout rate is real amongst professionals.

        There were also mass school shootings before Columbine. The Ecole’ Polytechnique massacre for instance in Canada had 22 victims in 1989 and was committed with a semi automatic weapon and it spurred a massive surge in gun regulation and restrictions for automatic weapons and maximum clip size capacity. The US is unique in that it is the only country to experience these mass shootings and yet refuse any wide ranging gun control reforms at a federal level in response.

        The problem also spills over borders. 85 percent of weapons found to be used to commit crimes in Canada have been traced to purchases made in the US.

      • mob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually agree with what you are saying, but I don’t believe it’s so black and white. I also believe the media realized the profits in outrage and terror so that’s why we are constantly hammered with it… which is likely a contributing factor in mental health issues of the country/world.

        Columbine was one of the biggest ones ever at the time and a media field day, but definitely not the only school shootings around that time.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States_(before_2000)

        • SirStumps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was the only one I was aware of so I do apologize for my ignorance. I appreciate your candor in the conversation at hand.

          The media is a for profit organization that feeds on misinformation, half truths, lies, or propaganda. Reagan did the country a disservice removing the the Fairness Doctrine.

      • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is not a mental health crisis. At all. It is a radical fascist mediasphere crisis. Centrists have constantky defended the right of radical fascists to spend all day on the airwaves edging the audience to kill for their sponsors.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why does this only happen in the US? The whole world is having mental health issues?

        • SirStumps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Mass killings don’t only happen in the US. The middle east they use bombs, missiles, and guns. If someone wants to accomplish something they will find a means. Guns are just a tool like any other thing. You can harm just as many people with a nail gun, a knife, a bomb, acid, or fire. Anything can be a weapon in the wrong hands.

          I do believe there are definitely people who shouldn’t have a gun but they are typically mentally unstable.

          As for assault rifles. I believe that only prior military should be able to poses them since they more than likely have had extensive safety training.

          Edit: I also believe that instead of glorifying mass shootings we should mock and demean the person. Too many people have it in their head that they will go down in history for such and act.

          • kaffiene@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure. Mass killings occur everywhere but no where with the frequency that they do in the US. Middle east bombs is a terrible comparison though,. Those are acts of war not individuals picking up weapons and going on a rampage. No less awful for that, but not the topic under discussion. You didn’t answer my question. Mental health issues are everywhere in the world. Only the US is racking up mass shootings quicker than days of the year. If it were just mental health, why doesn’t the rest of the world show the same effects?