cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoLinux Userslemmy.mlimagemessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down125cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.28Karrow-down1imageLinux Userslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square145linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareaeharding@vger.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up34·4 days agoThe number of people who don’t reverse-I-search is too damn high
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoIt was quite a while before I realised that was possible. Then not long after starting to use it, that I got fed up and just started opening up the history file and searching in it.
minus-squaredropcase@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agowhy not history | grep -i and the search term? even if there are several, you can use ! and the command’s line number to run it again
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agohistory is shell dependent.
The number of people who don’t reverse-I-search is too damn high
CTRL+R for those unitiated
reverse-i-search + fzf = <3
It was quite a while before I realised that was possible.
Then not long after starting to use it, that I got fed up and just started opening up the history file and searching in it.
why not
history | grep -iand the search term?even if there are several, you can use ! and the command’s line number to run it again
historyis shell dependent.