fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down13
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareladicius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 year agoPlanned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California? 400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
minus-squareZeroCooler@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoPer the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
minus-squareDudewitbow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
minus-squareares35@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agodefinitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.
minus-squareXeekei@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.
Planned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California?
400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
Per the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
It might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
definitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.
Yea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.