• Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Presumably it’d mean either the end of the monarchy or the end of the government as we know it, so it’s a win-win for us lol

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean he’s 70-odd and has basically been powerless his whole life, if the options are to rock the boat or kick the can down the road and live out his last decade or two doing bugger-all in unimaginable opulence, I can see why he’d pick the latter.

        Like it’s not necessarily the morally right option, but I get it.

      • 3arn0wl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, I can understand that, but he’s been a lead voice on the environment a lot longer than most. I guess he’s swapped his beliefs & scruples for the trappings of monarchy, and that diminishes him rather than elivates him in my eyes.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You expected him to be making political statements as the monarch?

          The only reason the monarchy still exists is because the head of it remains apolitical.

          • 3arn0wl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess I had some inchoate expectation that he’d be more influential. Sunak’s just turned him into a hypocrite.