To the surprise of nobody at all I’m sure. If they’re do worried about the speed limit they should not allow cars. They should have trains, trams, trolleys and buses.
But then how will the impoverished law enforcement make money? They don’t get enough money to keep us safe as it is. They work so hard… yeah, I can’t keep this up.
Maybe is those cameras gave automatic tickets and deportation notices?
something something $1/oz reflective spray-on something something under weather-resistant plate cover sounds like civil d’oh-bedience 🤌🏼
Totally unrelated side question: how many blue-ribbon piglets did the city catch abusing their “public servant” station? Just asking.
edit: Aww, my bad, I didn’t notice the instance before replying. Enjoy your Trumpland, fucknuts. 😜
Speeding is not civil disobedience, it’s being an asshole.
Keeping cameras that record your license plate as you travel through intersections should be fucking outlawed, I don’t care how much speeding they stop.
I don’t care how much companies and municipalities claim they don’t record info on non-speeders, until your entire system is FLOSS and goes through regular 3rd party audits, that shit isn’t to be trusted.
They don’t stop speeding just like harsher penalties don’t stop most kinds of crime
If you want people to slow down, you paint the lanes smaller, make them narrow regularly, add roundabouts and plastic bollards between the lanes - you have to actually address the problem, which is the speed people feel natural driving at on any given road
The ones you can go after are the people weaving between traffic and racing, but I doubt a letter in the mail is going to do much
Speed cameras that are controlled explicitly by the same group that directly benefits from their inaccuracy are not infallible, citizen.
Think.
Something rifle something bow ting somethin
Seek help
