Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that’s an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.
I’ll go first: I think “Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows” was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.
Doesn’t break 60 as it has 63, but I think it still counts. Ang Lee’s The Hulk. Ok listen, Abomination isn’t great, and the hulk stuff is a snoozer. But I think it’s the first and only movie with the Hulk in it that actually GOT the hulk. It’s more a cerebral picture about Bruce Banner dealing with all of this, rather than an action movie. The Hulk is Bruce’s failure, not his super hero. Edward Norton did a great job with the role, and honestly it really is worth a watch, just focus on the Bruce more than the Hulk and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
Edit: Lol. Both replies are right, Louis Leterrier’s Hulk Movie. Which sits at… . 67. The post remains!
You’re describing Louis Leterriers The Incredible Hulk, not Ang Lee’s Hulk.
You are very correct, and I am very foolish. But yeah, Louis Leterriers. I also forgot to mention the comic book style to the movie, it didn’t exactly work but it was an interesting idea that I’m surprised someone else hasn’t improved upon.
Ang Lee’s Hulk was the Eric Bana one, not the Edward Norton one which rebooted the series after nobody liked Ang Lee’s one.
Oh I am a stupid man… but the movie is a 67, I’m going to let it ride, still enjoyed that one.