Maybe, I guess it all depends on whether they agree on how transferable said license is, and whether courts or even just DMCA enforcers at a host or registar will agree with that (DMCA safe-harbor provisions encourage providers to act preemptively rather than duke it out in court else they risk losing protection against liability).
Obviously one’s own server’s TOS guarantees they have the license to host their users’ content, but it might not be as clear for other federated servers, since they have their own TOS that protects them in that event, but if the user didn’t sign up there, they aren’t agreeing to them, and they could even reject it and still have their content federated there whether they like it or not.
Seems like it could potentially be a dicey grey area if they chose to pursue federation as copyright infringement. Especially if they copyrighted their comments and posts officially.
I think the idea that’s your content will be rehosted by other servers and you give implicit permissions to do so should he part of your tos
Maybe, I guess it all depends on whether they agree on how transferable said license is, and whether courts or even just DMCA enforcers at a host or registar will agree with that (DMCA safe-harbor provisions encourage providers to act preemptively rather than duke it out in court else they risk losing protection against liability).
Obviously one’s own server’s TOS guarantees they have the license to host their users’ content, but it might not be as clear for other federated servers, since they have their own TOS that protects them in that event, but if the user didn’t sign up there, they aren’t agreeing to them, and they could even reject it and still have their content federated there whether they like it or not. Seems like it could potentially be a dicey grey area if they chose to pursue federation as copyright infringement. Especially if they copyrighted their comments and posts officially.