• EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am experiencing such banning of providers right now. It is a whack-a-mole, seems futile. Not to mention that most people use sketchy free noname VPNs that are just too numerous. Or apparently some people set up basic XRay/VLESS/whatever and sell it via a Telegram bot…

        • Admax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not mentionning that anyone can set up their own VPN server… Good fucking luck with that 💀

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can ban big hosting providers, but even here they’re cautious with measures like that because it would break WAY too much. Not to mention that you could just use a lesser-known one, even if it doesn’t operate in the country legally.

            • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’d like to see them ban Microsoft azure, aws, or whatever Google calls it. Not to mention the numerous smaller providers.

              Italians will just pay with crypto to get around payment bans.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I bet there comes the day that I need to share access to my server to allow people from other countries accessing the real free web through me…

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        So by going harder on blocking content that China? Because that’s what they do but most of the big providers get through after a day or two of downtime each time the government make a change to block them.

    • orize@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Supreme fascist control doesn’t start immediately. It needs to take one small baby step every day.

  • hossein@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never heard of forcing VPN providers to block something. Kinda defeats the purpose. Long live Tor I guess?

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Can’t you just vpn to another vpn ?

    I’m not an expert on internet security but I do know there is no way in hell to legislate around blocking internet. Even China’s great firewall isn’t working.

    I guess by passing legislation like this you get most people to be compliant, but this is about pirates, who were already actively non compliant in the first place.

    The folks who pirate the content are literally going to have to click one extra button or something like that to work around the vpns trying to block stuff…

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sure there will be workarounds.

      I think there are plenty of people who would be pirates if it were more convenient, but I suspect the point of diminishing returns for legislation has already been passed. If you’re savvy and dedicated enough to use a VPN in the first place, then this probably won’t stop you. Non-tech-savvy people are already turned off of torrents for half a dozen different reasons.

      DNS, though? That will block a lot of people from accessing things like Z-library, which is currently easy enough to access for anyone who knows how to use Google.

      China’s measures have been largely successful, unfortunately. It’s still possible to VPN out, but it’s a risk a lot of people are unwilling to take since it could realistically get them in trouble. I’ve lost contact with some friends in China because we have no shared platforms and the increasing blocking measures over the past 10 years finally passed their tolerance threshold.

      I guess I could figure out how to use iMessage, which AFAIK is the only end-to-end encrypted messaging service that still works (or at least the only moderately popular one). Makes me wonder how secure it really is if China hasn’t banned it…

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      They will use it to jail anyone caught using the internet illegally. Most likely people that are ideologically opposed to them.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s Italy, there is no chance of that efficiency. This is - as usual - stuff done to prevent pirated sport content. Nothing else has ever and probably will ever be done.

  • Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    With these kind of news from Southern Europe it’s always about pirate football streams. How much does it cost to watch football legally in Italy?

    • Giooschi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only options you have are:

      • Dazn Standard (45€/month, 35€/month if you pay for 12 months) to get access to all the SerieA matches (and a whole bunch of other sports nobody cares about)

      • Dazn Goal Pass (20€/month, 14€/month if you pay for 12 months) to get access to 3 SerieA matches per week which you don’t get to choose (and a bunch of other sports nobody cares about)

      • Sky (16€/month for the first 18 months, then whatever Sky wants after that) to get access to 3 SerieA matches per week which you don’t get to choose (and a bunch of other stuff nobody cares about)

      Most people care only about some specific matches, so your only option is Dazn.

      Dazn is also a very crappy service, it often has connectivity problems and also has ads. Fun fact, if you get a connection issue while watching a Dazn ad, it will restart.

      So, as usual, monopoly, high costs and crappy services drive piracy.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Important note: wages in Italy are VERY low. 45€/month is a significant expense.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        🤮

        Imagine stuffing so much cash in the butt of a rich guy, only to look how other, most likely better earners than you, play against each others using a tiny ball.

        I don’t get sports fanatics…

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That would be unusual. Most sports stadiums in most major cities are heavily subsidized by the city/state (e.g. tax payers), especially in public transportation. I’d be surprised if even a small % were 100% privately funded.

    • InvisibleShoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t even have to go that far, just change your DNS to a non-Australian one. Anything that turns up from a “top 10 dns providers” search works.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is actually about having the power of one person in an office wiping out any internet domain from the country.