Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoFraudsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1620arrow-down19
arrow-up1611arrow-down1imageFraudsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThere are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThere are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoOk, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoI think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.
There are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
There are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
Ok, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
I think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.