For instance, let’s say there’s a troll who is infamous online to the point multiple people are chronicling the troll’s numerous antics.
The troll in question lies about everything about themselves. Their name is an alias, they admitted to using an AI generated voice while trying to get away with passing it off as their own. They steal women’s selfies to pretend to be another person. This is just a few examples, but this troll has gotten posts exposing them taken down because the posts reveal personal information, but if the personal information is fake to begin with, is that against the rules on most sites?
Edit: assuming all the info came from the troll’s posts, that is publicly available.
A newly appointed moderator of AskLemmy on Lemmy.world is a malicious troll with a 5+ year long history of trolling, doxing, telling trans people to shoot up schools and kill themselves, defending a Nazi, impersonating people and catfishing.
They gaslight and call any proof against them being brought up “slander” and like to portray themselves as a victim who is being targeted for no reason. They’ve been at this for literal years.
not gonna read all of that, so might ask questions, that are burried there somewhere, bear with me.
why can’t you block asklemmy and this guy and say fuck it?
he seems to be an asshole and what i saw from him got downvoted a lot. so why bother?
my granny used to say: “the angrier you get, they become happier”
edit: and please stop puting complete sentenses into links, hard to see how many links there are, sometimes. it’s better to make it one word only. or just post the link in clear text. saves people not only from getting rickrolled.