• spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    In general, let’s gently redirect anger away from protest voters.

    First, I haven’t seen any evidence suggesting that the volume of protest votes would have impacted the Electoral College. Harris would have likely won Michigan, but that seems to be the extent of what would have happened if all protest votes had flipped to blue. (Please feel free to correct me with evidence if this is inaccurate.)

    Second, you’re directing your frustration at the wrong group. The Democratic Party ran a campaign that was basically center right and fostered mass apathy at the polls. That’s the real issue. You can continue to direct anger at non-voters, but all this infighting does little to hold the Democratic Party accountable for running a campaign that encouraged people to literally stay home.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can vouch for Michigan, writing was on the wall as far back as 2023 when the Gaza thing started.

      Although I think it still would have been close, Detroit auto was not happy with Biden handing out free money for layoffs.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      First, I haven’t seen any evidence suggesting that the volume of protest votes would have impacted the Electoral College.

      Doesn’t matter. They voted not knowing if they were going to be the deciding factor or not.

      all this infighting does little to hold the Democratic Party accountable for running a campaign that encouraged people to literally stay home.

      They ran a cleaner, less hateful campaign which focused way more on policy than the Republican’s campaign.

      It’s not the campaign that’s the issue. It’s stupid Americans voting against their own best interests because they fell for propaganda and because they always hold the Democratic party to a higher standard. The brunt of the blame lies squarely on the American electorate. Our government is a reflection of our ignorant electorate.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They ran a cleaner, less hateful campaign which focused way more on policy than the Republican’s campaign.

        And a much more hateful campaign than the same party’s campaign four years ago. Feel like leaving that out invalidates everything else you are trying to push.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, they get lumped right in with the people that stayed home. They knew they were throwing their vote away because they knew there was zero chance of their party winning the election.

      The real issue is that all the protest voters and protest non voters enabled this guy, on purpose, and they know it:

      Kilmeade then asked Trump: “Are you on-board with the way the [Israel Defense Force] is taking the fight to Gaza?”

      “You’ve got to finish the problem,” he said.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        fault doesn’t matter. what matters is influence. the democratic party has SO MUCH MONEY to use for influence, and they used all that influence to basically make the perfect case to voters to conclude that they might as well stay home.

        their conclusion was wrong of course, but to the working class american, that’s the image that was successfully projected into their minds.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          the democratic party has SO MUCH MONEY to use for influence

          How much does money influence matter in an election when you’re up against a party utilizing extreme propaganda and hate/fear as their tools to convince a generally very ignorant electorate?

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            A lot. It has a lot of influence. I wish the Dems would do propaganda. Instead they catered to suburban conservatives who were already locked in for Trump, all while capitulating to neo-Nazi fearmongering over trans people and the border. Isn’t that just a great use of their resources?

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I wish the Dems would do propaganda.

              I mean there are consequences to utilizing fear based propaganda to win an election. You need look no further than the Republican party for proof. They are locked in to courting racists for votes now and that’s absolutely detrimental to our society. Two parties giving up the high road and going all in the the low road would lead us down a very dark path.

              But then again, how do you run a clean campaign against a dirty campaign and win when Americans are easily influenced by propaganda?