Not Chad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-21 month agoseriouslylemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up1-7arrow-down1imageseriouslylemmy.worldNot Chad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-21 month agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelemonmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoAre we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
minus-squareUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoUnless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
minus-squareNot Chad McTruth@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-21 month agohes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad
Are we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
Unless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
hes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad