@const_void@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoThose free USB sticks in your drawer are somehow crappier than you thoughtarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1275arrow-down111cross-posted to: youshouldknow@lemmy.world
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkThose free USB sticks in your drawer are somehow crappier than you thoughtarstechnica.com@const_void@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: youshouldknow@lemmy.world
minus-square@Cort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish20•4 months agoit fails the top tier qc check, but passes a low tier qc check. That’s how different price points/tiers for CPUs exist.
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglish9•4 months agoAnd then there’s those who fail the low tier check and “some friend” gets them for scrap en masse.
minus-square@fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoThat sounds like two different ways of saying the same thing. It failed to be the best, but it was good enough to be used for something else.
it fails the top tier qc check, but passes a low tier qc check. That’s how different price points/tiers for CPUs exist.
And then there’s those who fail the low tier check and “some friend” gets them for scrap en masse.
That sounds like two different ways of saying the same thing.
It failed to be the best, but it was good enough to be used for something else.