

Only Bayes Can Judge Me
titotal??? I heard they were dead! (jk. why did they stop hanging here, I forgetā¦)
the second scott
this is low hanging fruit but: yeah absolutely rancid takes on the middle east from scootson. who would have thought he would produce such nuance-free, fascist opinions about geopolitics?
s/o to one of the comments basically saying that Scott is the Simone de Beauvoir of rationalism
Itās probably been discussed a shit-ton already, but boy does this guy not get why heās a chud. Consider these two quotes, heavily edited for brevity:
Iām [ā¦] a liberal Zionist, [ā¦] etc. ([an identity] well-enough represented at LessOnline [ā¦]).
and:
The closest to right-wing politics that I witnessed at LessOnline was [moderate politics].
Of course, one shouldnāt expect s11n.blog to understand the fascist, let alone right-wing, nature of liberalism or Zionism. That is simply how fascists are.
Doing some reading about the SAG-AFTRA video game voice acting strike. Anyone have details about āEthovoxā, the AI company that SAG has apparently partnered with?
cool story, bro
lol the corollary of this is that LLMs are incapable of producing meaningful output, you insufferable turd
Given that the LLMs typically have a system prompt that specifies a particular tone for the output, I think pretentious is an absolutely valid and accurate word to use.
dark forest internet here we go!!!
itās funny to me that these futurist/thought leader/tech genius utterly fail to build their cult compounds where a goofy ass cult like Scientology has blown past them completely
network state
Great, a new stupid thing to know about. How likely is it that a bunch of people that believe they are citizens of an online state will become yet another player in the Stochastic Terrorism as a Service industry?
Oh, thatās a good angle too. Prompt the LLM with āwhat insights does this book have about B2B salesā or something.
take 2 minutes to think of precisely the information I need
I canāt even put into words the full nonsense of this statement. How do you think this would work? This is not how learning works. This is not how research works. This is not how anything works.
This part threw me as well. If you can think of it, why read for it? Didnāt make sense and so I stopped looking into this particular abyss until you pointed it out again.
I think the only interpretation of what this person said that approaches some level of rationality on their part is essentially a form of confirmation bias. They arenāt thinking of information that is in the text, they are thinking āI want this text to confirm X for meā, then they prompt and get what they want. LLMs are biased to be people-pleasers and will happily spin whatever hallucinated tokens the user throws at them. Thatās my best guess.
That you didnāt think of the above just goes to show the failure of your unfeeble mindās logic and reason to divine such a truth. Just kidding, sorta, in the sense that you canāt expect to understand an irrational thought process using rationality.
But if itās not that Iām still thrown.
Dune
Prompts ChatGPT, skims the output because of muh āfishency
The Omelas Hole sure sounds like a paradise, I want to live in there!
Thatās reasonable, and especially achievable if you donāt use chatbots or digital assistants!
I wonder if some of those chuds think those waymos might be conscious
what kind of semen retention scheme is this
Note to the Peanut gallery: this guy knows about paperclipmaxxing but not this more famous comic. Curious. lmfao