This is incredibly stupid. While China and the rest of the world are leading the charge in renewable energy, the U.S. is set to remain in the Stone Age due to pure hubris and short-term profit gains.

Paying 1.2 billion to get rid of that technology is just ideologically short-sighted. It’s simply stupid.

Oh… Well… Sailing the high seas?

But everyone was hoping the next Mass Effect game would return to its sources, not continue the “My face is tired” series. But I was hoping too much.

They should be in %USERPROFILE%\Documents\BioWare\Mass Effect Legendary Edition\Save.

That’s what I’m worried about. I played the Mass Effect Trilogy several times and they’re my all times favourite.

But this Saudi Arabia deal is not good for the industry because as we know, Saudi Arabia is a very conservative muslim country and it will destroy the creative process.

I hope you will have better standards soon.

!sanitation@lemmy.today, I notice that you post a lot of garbage like this post.

In this day and age, we need to appear drummer than AI.

Hey! He used a semicolon! AI generated!

Watch how quickly the US government will try to ban them in the name of security. They’ll claim that they transmit RAM data to the Chinese government 😛.

In my opinion, I just don’t understand permissive licenses. For example, with FreeBSD’s license, companies can essentially “steal” the hard-earned efforts and use them to enrich themselves. For example, FreeBSD could have been a gaming OS, as the PlayStation’s OS is FreeBSD. However, they didn’t give anything back to the community.

Copyleft licenses, on the other hand, require companies to contribute any changes they make to the code back to the community so that it benefits the community as a whole. In this case, there’s no “stealing”, companies need to respect the community’s efforts by giving back.

That’s my two cents anyway.

In my opinion, only PC and Linux matter. We desperately need Linux to succeed because it’s a community project. Yes, companies contribute to it, but it’s still a community project with no for-profit objective.

For many in the open-source community, contributing is an affair of love, not a way to enrich shareholders. We need this ecosystem to compete with console companies and Microsoft in the PC market.

In my opinion, AI is here to stay. But OpenAI and Anthropic will suffer because companies realized that don’t need a Ferarri all the time, they can do with a Honda (Chinese open-source models) 90% of the time.

Don’t downvote him; he’s right. The next administration should fund Voice of America (VOA) and PBS to provide free information. The NYT is a for-profit organization.

Long before the internet, we had to buy newspapers. I don’t like it, but that’s the reality of business.

Chinese open-source models are becoming the norm. You don’t need the latest model from ChatGPT (e.g., a Ferrari) to complete your task. A simple Honda will suffice (open-source models), and it uses a lot less energy since it runs on your home or company’s infrastructure.

Because of that, I predict that we’re going to see a lot of financial hardship among AI companies.

deleted by creator

Thank you for the PSA good friend!

Huh, me neither:

Thomson Reuters Corporation (/ˈrɔɪtərz/ ⓘ ROY-tərz) is a Canadian multinational content-driven technology conglomerate.[4] The company was founded in Toronto, Ontario, and maintains its headquarters in the city at 19 Duncan Street.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reuters?wprov=sfti1

And the fact that it is a debate tell you everything about the state of the world today… sigh

I feel for Framework. They’re not a big company like Apple with any sway. Even Apple had to raise its prices, which speaks to the state of the market.

We should care, vibe coded projects are not maintainable.