

I thought they didn’t block political figures… Guess the muskrat just meant the figures he agrees with…
I thought they didn’t block political figures… Guess the muskrat just meant the figures he agrees with…
Well, you did just describe my experience with diet Pepsi pretty well…
Probably more because of how easy it is to drink than raw strength… It’s way easier to put away a bunch of 70 proof sweetened liqueur than the same amount of alcohol worth of 80+ proof hard liquor, very easy to not realize how much you’ve had until way too late
I’m pretty sure that’s regular Coke zero, unless they’ve changed the packaging again
But yeah, something about the artificial sweetener just doesn’t work with alcohol
Thank you for saving me from wasting my time on that slop
I would love to have that level of optimism again… Here’s hoping it actually works out that way
And then Biff Tannen was elected US president
It’s the modern day book burning
Let’s see if it actually plays out that way in practice
That statement could be applied to a lot of things he’s done and gotten away with so far so forgive me if that fails to give me hope
Last I heard was a couple weeks ago them stating clearly that they would not comply, and doing a bit of searching I can’t find anything more recent that contradicts that stance… Where did you see that they’d reversed that decision?
If it’s on the table, I’ll accept it, even though I too would want more
Really? Because I thought they would fall apart way faster than they did, I’m honestly amazed they lasted past the inauguration
Didn’t get a bingo!
Wait… Was I supposed to circle the ones I do relate to?! Dammit.
As bad as this is, it isn’t actually saying anything about using the military alongside law enforcement, though it does talk about giving law enforcement excess military assets and training and likely opens the door to using personnel as well (section 4-b), though they could just interpret “assets” to include forces… Anyway, either way this is bad
ETA: actually, the more I read it and think about it, especially in context of what the administration has been up to lately, they’re almost certainly going to try to use it to deploy military forces for civilian policing
No one is above the law
Agreed… Maybe you should be telling your boss that…
Yes, but which new one should I use?
Nevermind, I’m sure they’ll both be plenty broken
I mean, I’m pretty sure he could get one quickly… He’s got plenty of money from all the bribes he’s been soliciting…
Even when they do call him on it, any enforcement of that will be coming from agencies he’s loaded with sycophants
If they were apathetic they wouldn’t fight so hard to prevent a single red cent being used to help people