• 3 Posts
  • 249 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 22nd, 2026

help-circle









  • I use Caddy with Authelia and Caddy MIB. Anything that I need access to is exposed via reverse proxy with Authelia infront of it. That sometimes mean I have to login twice. Caddy MIB makes it so repeat offenders are blocked for longer and longer. Prevents brute forcing stuff like Jellyfin.

    I am considering using Tailscale (or Headscale) because I could combine that with Mullvad VPN and still have my internal DNS. But I only have one server and I have hairpin NAT configured so I just enter my domain name inside and outside of my LAN and it just workstm. I also considered using Traefik but Caddy just just workstm. Only problem I had was with Dawarish needing brotli encryption, I had to create my own docker image (and then I automated keeping it up to date with Woodpecker CI and Renovate).

    All in all, I like the reverse proxy route.










  • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.worldtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLMAO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    TIL there are definitions for what constitutes an open format, at least in the US (US government).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_file_format

    “An open format is one that is platform independent, machine readable, and made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the re-use of that information”.

    Anyway, saying that a format is not open because of restrictions on its use is in my opinion (some what) equal to saying that something is not FOSS because of the license they use. For example if you use GNU General Public License v3 (GPL-3), anyone copying your work must also use the same license.

    It would not be an open format if I had to pay for its use. It would be open if I can use it without cost but have to provide what I use it for with the same restrictions.

    Open as far as I know is not defined by law anywhere, it will be up to opinion in the end. Having a different opinion and thus having a different definition of a word makes communications more difficult, so agreeing on the meaning is preferred.

    It still wouldn’t be an open format.

    What do you think?