Rothe

No, they just shouldn’t exist. And they shouldn’t use materials for renewable energy which could be used to provide power to actual useful things.

Moronic lore though.

What is JAL?

But not 3 clicks.

Nobody did that. This is a treasure which was deliberately buried, it was not for carrying around.

He gets a monetary reward.

You need to tell that to the tankies. We already know it here. They are the ones having problems understanding that.

And? You seem to be under the delusion that tankies have actually read anything by their heroes.

Tankies: “Any enemy of the US is my ally”.

It is a zero sum game for them. They are incapable of thinking that while the US sucks, their enemies can also suck.

Why would you ever trust such numbers?

But this is kind of circular logic. We need to convince people to stop defending trillionaires in order to be able to ban advertising or make any meaningful change at all.

So not very common sense after all?

Texas grand jury: “Nothing to see here.”

No. Only in evangelicalism.

That is not true. Lots of Christian denominations believe that as well. Most of them in fact. You are just Americentric in your belief that Evangelicalism is automatically meant, when that is not really a large denomination outside of the US.

Why are .ml’ers regurgitating right wing talking points in every single discussion? “edgelord reddit Atheism” is a thought cancelling sentence used by right wingers when confronted with critcism that questions their very foundational beliefs.

You are not providing a non-biblical primary source though, which is what they asked for. You are just hiding behind an appeal to authority fallacy.

You can be perfectly skeptical of the miraculous claims about Jesus, but he’s about as well attested in history as Alexander the Great.

That is a blatant lie, and it shows great ignorance of the facts of the matter and the historical method in general since you chose as an example one of the best documented persons of the period. We have lots of contemporary direct evidence of the existence of Alexander the Great: epigraphy, coinage, archaelogy and transmitted written sources by contemporary authors.

We have no such contemporary evidence for Jesus at all. So no, your argument is nonsense and not how history works. The consensus of the existence of a Jesus is based on secondary evidence, which makes it very likely that he existed, but historians can never certify that with absolute certainty the way that they can with Alexander the Great.

Edit: Oh my, you edited your comment to not read what you claimed when I replied to you. But in your edit you did not ackowledge my reply to you blatantly incorrect claim, you just slightly edited it, to read something else, which is also incorrect.

Wow, you really want to be right about this even though your cause is a lost one, even to the point of being disingenous and lying about your previous comment and not acknowledging that your comment was wrong.

Why you would do such a thing, lying and editing your comment without acknowledging your mistake, is something only you would know the reason for. We know how much your word is worth now.

It is not undisputed. We have no contemporary evidence of his existence, but scholars agree on a consensus that he most likely existed, based on a range of secondary conjectural evidence.

It cannot be undisputed though, since we have no certainty, and the scholars involved in the consensus are freely admitting to that.

That consensus is knowingly based on the complete lack of any contemporary sources though. So the consensus is that he most likely existed, based on a wide variety of conjectural evidence, but there is no way to confirm with any certainty that he did.

AMD is fully onboard the AI bubble as well though. Just with less money since they own a smaller part of the market than NVIDIA.

It is a sad fact that unless you buy used, there is no way around supporting an AI company when buying gpu.