• dogsoahC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It pretty neatly fits the definition of (individual) terrorism (which doesn’t really exist). It was an act of violence, not based on personal grievance with the direct victim, but based on grievance with the system he represented. But, yeah, they probably wouldn’t ever pull that when someone gets murdered for racist reasons, which you could also classify as terrorism.

    🎶 Because it’s about class and not about justice. 🎶

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      This is kinda the OG definition of terrorism actually. Back when 19th century anarchists invented this hot new direct action political tactic called terrorism. It was all the rage, for a while, but it backfired and increased public sympathy towards the bourgeoisie and the nobility.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      For what it’s worth, we do have hate crime laws that are supposed to be used in cases where racism is at play. I’m not saying it’s always used, but we do have additional penalties for it.