• the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No, he didn’t. Here’s a full transcript of the interview.

    Relevant part:

    Question: If the prices of groceries don’t come down, will your presidency be a failure?

    Answer: I don’t think so. Look, they got them up. I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will. I think that energy is going to bring them down. I think a better supply chain is going to bring them down. You know, the supply chain is still broken. It’s broken. You see it. You go out to the docks and you see all these containers. And I own property in California, in Palos Verdes. They’re very nice. And I passed the docks, and I’ve been doing it for 20 years. I’ve never seen anything like it. You know, for 17 years, I saw containers and, you know, they’d come off and they’d be taken away—big areas, you know, you know, in that area, you know, where they have the big, the big ships coming in—big, the port. And I’d see this for years as I was out there inspecting property and things, because they own a lot in California. And I look down and I see containers that are, that are 12, 13, 14 containers. You wouldn’t believe they can hold each other. It’s like crazy. No, the supply chain is is broken. I think a very bad thing is this, what they’re doing with the cars. I think they lost also because of cars. You know, there are a lot of reasons, but the car mandate is a disaster. The electric, the EV mandate.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean, the only thing he’s proposing will fix the issue is other people’s actions. In that statement he isn’t suggesting any solutions nor discussing a plan, hes saying if other people fix other problems it may help prices.

      That seems like abdicating to me.

        • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s not what the headline says, it says “Trump isn’t going to do anything about grocery prices” which is exactly what his statement confirms. He said it’s hard and it’ll probably be fixed by things outside his control, which is explicitly saying he won’t do a damn thing.

          • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Part of his platform was lowering energy prices - “Drill, Baby, Drill!” He expects grocery prices to go down as a result.

              • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                My point the whole time has been that the article has a bad headline. If he said something like “We can’t lower prices,” then it’d make sense.

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              9 hours ago

              He had a golden opportunity to make that argument and instead talked about how much property he owned and to talk about a loading dock he drove by.

              • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                8 hours ago

                It was part of his platform and the part I emphasized shows him referencing it. The author of this article is misleading people with his headline.

                • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  You agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate

                  • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    I’m saying that’s his argument. I don’t know if it’ll work out, but this conversation started because the headline is false.