You’re old, straight, white and rich, motherfucker – YOU’RE going to be “ok.” Everyone else is fucked.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    Mildly? I’m radicalized as fuck. This is the most infuriating shit. Fucken useless ass democrats are only good at constructing elaborate and expensive footguns. They couldn’t read the fucken room and hear people screaming for any change at all.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ve changed man, since then. I don’t know how I feel about the Democrats, but I’m devastated over who voted Republican. So many people in this country voted for him. It wasn’t just we had low turnout, but also just that he had so much. That’s the disheartening thing for me, that still, with everything we know, he still carries 50% of this country easily. So yeah, we had too few, but worse, he has too many.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        100
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Right? I found pre-election solace in knowing that even though his cult will never turn on him, he couldn’t have possibly gotten MORE supporters in the past 4 years.

        Turns out they LOVE the hate and they want more of it.

        Sorry, Mindless Americans, it’s not Trump’s fault anymore, it’s YOURS.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          73
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          That’s what I’ve come around to. It’s not him. He’s a figurehead that we apply blame but it’s not. It’s the people - the public. They want this. They have the fear and the hate, they actively want it. If America didn’t want him, they wouldn’t have voted him in. Even with tampering/whatever, if America didn’t, he wouldn’t be there. But America does want him, and that’s a very sobering and sad thought to me. I try to live with a simple code - do what you want, as long as it doesn’t hurt others. I learned yesterday that most American’s don’t have similar values.

          • m_f@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            IMO that’s way off base. People want change. They know they’re getting screwed, and the grifter is promising change. He’s lying and I think most people know that, but the fact that they’d take a convicted felon over what the DNC offered up is a crushing repudiation.

            Bernie would’ve mopped the floor with Trump, because he also offers change. Someone like Obama would’ve too, even though there was a paucity of actual change during his terms.

            We need to drag the DNC kicking and screaming off of the corporate dick it’s sucking, and get it left enough to offer real change, and people will vote for it in droves.

            • Stovetop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              Part of me blames the collective memory loss of the COVID years and a complete lack of understanding of cause and effect.

              It’s like everyone forgot there was this massive global pandemic which absolutely killed entire industries. And even though the important parts were propped up during the lean times by government support, that support ended eventually, with the economy still a mess that couldn’t just be put back together like nothing happened.

              I mean, people at that time didn’t even have a concept of what was going on. They have no idea how much money was spent keeping the lights on. People lost their shit over the billions it would cost to forgive student loans, but had no idea how many more billions were already spent on—and abused by—businesses whose pandemic loans were forgiven by the government.

              Everyone forgot the pandemic was only as bad as it was in the US because it was so completely mishandled by the Trump administration. We could have had everything back to normal a lot sooner if there was even a little bit of national preparedness, not to mention if we didn’t have all the misinformation spread by his own administration.

              So when the economy went to shit in 2021-2022 during the Biden administration, people shrugged their shoulders and put the blame on the old man in the white house, despite the fact that it’s been on a recovery trend during this last year. And so Trump’s first year is going to start with stronger markets, he’ll get the credit, and then things will get worse just in time for someone else to take the blame for it.

                • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  Do you have figures that include 2024? That data seems to stop at 2021. Not saying you’re wrong but the picture being painted is just Biden’s first year as president during the height of the pandemic.

                  Comparing things like rates of inflation and the consumer price index, we see the numbers drop dramatically within the past two years, which seems to have been improving cost of living somewhat (or, ruining less quickly, at least) for the average American, though there is still a lot more to be done.

            • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              26 days ago

              How is voting for a literal past president any kind of change? America chose hate and blame this week.

              • m_f@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                He will bring lots of change. None of it good, but the DNC should view that as a crushing repudiation of their approach. They can’t even blame the Electoral College, they fucked up that badly. Hopefully they’ll learn a goddamn thing or two and run someone offering positive change.

                • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 days ago

                  It was incredibly hard to fight the constant youtube and tiktok right-wing extremism that they’ve been fed. They’ve been taught to hate women and minorities so much that they vote for literal Hitler.

                  • m_f@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    25 days ago

                    If you’re just some dude, and you’ve got youtubers saying “you matter and you’re cool” on the one hand, and “cis white men suck #KillAllMen”, what do you think you’d be attracted to? That’s a generalization of course, but identity politics has got to go. We need more of this aesthetic on the left:

                    Not that exact poster obviously, but we need something that gives people a vision of the future and makes it cool. Until that happens, get ready for more Trump and his ilk.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’ve tried talking to trumpers to point out the double standards, contradictions, and outright lies. They don’t listen, just ad hominem or whatabout out of it.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            26 days ago

            So much whatabout. Are they actually convincing themselves this way, or do they realize it’s stupid but just don’t have anything else to say?

            Trump sexually assaulted people and was convicted of fraud.

            Whatabout Hillary’s emails and Hunters laptop?

            First off, those people aren’t running for president AND it’s not fucking RAPE AND FRAUD!!!

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’ve tried talking and that doesn’t work, I’ve also tried being kind and all that shit no dice. But everyone gets upset when I say let’s shoot them, so please tell me more about how it’s my fault.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            I’ll say it for you. Thomas Crooks was THIS close to being an American hero.

              • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Nobody seemed to mind when Hans Gruber fell from Nakatomi Plaza.

                Or when the Wicked witch of the West got splashed with water.

                Or when The Death Star exploded.

                And I don’t give a fuck how rapists and felons, and the people that defend them, feel about what I say.

                • toasteecup@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  You forgot all the failed Hitler assassinations, nobody cried over those either

                  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    26 days ago

                    Yeah, I was trying to avoid THAT example because it’s become too cliche at this point.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          26 days ago

          Republicans actively work for an uneducated population they can rule. That’s the root of this problem.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            26 days ago

            The research is out, more educated people are more likely to vote Democrat, but if you ever point that out, all you get back is “I know YOU are, but what am I?”

      • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        26 days ago

        At least 1930s Germans could say their cizenry didn’t vote for Hitler. We Americans can’t say the same. I’m so ashamed of snd angry at my fellow Americans.

    • resin85@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      25 days ago

      The media completely failed at their job of informing the public.

      A democracy requires an informed citizenry, and the US media over the past eight years in particular created an increasingly misinformed citizenry.

      When people are more concerned that a trans girl might play on a softball team than that the climate crisis might profoundly devastate the biosphere and much of life on it, human and otherwise, for the next 10,000 years, the media has failed. When people worry about crime when it is low, an economy when it is thriving and immigrants when they do much of the hard work that sustains that economy and commit fewer crimes than the native-born, the media has failed.

      When it came to Donald Trump, they went easy on him, and they again and again let him and the far right set the agenda. They constantly treated asymmetrical issues as symmetrical ones – if the Democrats resisted Republican outrages, both sides were “polarized”. In the media everything had two sides, even if one side was the truth and the other was the lie, one side was the human rights or the law and the other side was their violation.

      They went soft on Trump’s criminality and incompetence, and his sheer volume of scandals meant that the past ones were forgotten as the next one erupted. He would not have won his 2016 minority victory had the US news media adequately conveyed that Trump was not the fun fictional character in the reality TV show The Apprentice; he was a serially bankrupt man repeatedly accused of sexual assault with a lot of criminal ties and a history of not paying his bills, being helped on by the Vladimir Putin regime, which had itself seriously corrupted the information environment of the election.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/07/us-progressive-election-trump-maga

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Or maybe what media thinks their job is isn’t what you think it should be. Maybe the media is deliberately promoting fascism for profit, has become our enemy, and needs to be destroyed.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      26 days ago

      I can’t really blame the Democrats. The public is who failed. The Democrats ran a sane adult. That alone should have been enough to beat Trump.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        No its not when people are in agony. To them, this is their torch. This is how fascism rises.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          We made it through the Recession and COVID-19, but now people are in agony? No fucking way. They chose fascism because they are awful.

          • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            Yeah. Fascism rises further because Americans voted for it, not because of the candidate.

            More important to have a Chad than anything.

      • normal_user@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Some extracts from a great comment from another user on lemmy (readfanon). I’ll paste this here since some people seem to think that the Democrats did nothing wrong and it is the “left” voters who failed them :

        1-You are chasing the DNC to the right and one day you will wake up and wonder to yourself “How did I end up all the way over here?” I’m not following you into that marsh but you’re welcome to go into it yourself, just don’t get upset at me when I point out what you’re heading into and don’t get angry when I refuse to blindly follow you.

        2-Historically, fascism has never been stopped at the ballot box. You being convinced that this is possible does not sway my opinion on any matter aside from my estimation of your political awareness and your ability to achieve change.

        3-You had four years (eight+ if you count Trump’s regime and the lead-up to it in this calculation) to “stop fascism”. What did you do in this period of time? Did you push Biden and Kamala to adopt policies which have mass support? Did you do anything except go to back to brunch?

        4-You aren’t entitled to others’ votes. Stop pretending that you are.

        5-We aren’t splitting the so-called left, Kamala Harris did that all by herself.

        6-You have no red lines. There is nothing that could make you not support Kamala Harris and we know it. Telling people to drop their standards and ignore their conscience to vote for Kamala is a fatal strategy and you killed her campaign by deploying it.

        7-Almost all of your arguments for voting for Kamala Harris (aside from the “it will stop Trump” argument which, in retrospect, appears to be a dismal failure) also apply to reasons for voting for Trump. “You can push them left”, “By voting we will get a seat at the table”, “Voting third party or not voting at all is a wasted vote”, “We have to vote this way to protect the country”, “Politics is about comprise - you cannot expect them to be your perfect political candidate”, and whatever hold-your-nose-and-vote arguments you trot out. Did you ever stop to ask yourself why it is that you do not find these arguments for voting Trump to be convincing?

        8-Last time Trump got elected you were brutally vindictive. You took glee in the thought of people in red states and marginalised groups suffering due to policy and things like natural disasters, regardless of their politics or how they chose to vote. You were excited to tell these people that they were going to get deported and put into concentration camps. You will do it again this time too because you have learned nothing. November came and these people you targeted with your vicious schadenfreude remembered. They aren’t going to forget how effortlessly you abandoned them and how you wished the worst suffering and ill-fate upon them.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          None of those excuses justifies voting for a clearly insane man. You don’t look at a normal person and a guy screaming about eating cats and say “that cat eating guy is the one out of the two who should have the nuclear codes”. It’s fucking moronic.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            26 days ago

            And half of it is either not true for me personally, based on some hefty assumptions even if applied generally, etc…

            • normal_user@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              Which of the points do you feel are not correct ?

              Could you elaborate on it ? Otherwise I can’t really motivate and explain them.

                • normal_user@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  I mean, you joined in on people having a discussion/debate on why Kamala lost, said some of the points are not valid and then refused to explain which point or why.

                  I guess you do you but we are still left wondering what could possibly be wrong about the original message for you.

                  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    26 days ago

                    Hey you got what you wanted, and you got to post a lengthy manifesto about it. I don’t feel obligated to give you more of my time than I already have.

          • normal_user@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            Neither Kamala Harris nor Trump should ever have access to nuclear codes !

            Let’s remember K.H. literally said she wanted to start a new war with Iran and that she wanted the “most lethal army in the world”.

            You fell for the Dems propaganda so hard you literally can’t see how both of the main runners for the elections were crazy far right candidates. There is no substantial distinction in foreign policy between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump so neither of them should have access to nukes, not voting for any of the two parties is the only logical conclusion.

            The only reason why the good 3rd party candidates are not electable is because of people like you that will blindly follow the Dems on their descent into fascism. The US does not need two Republican Parties, so stop supporting and justifying the second one. Go out and start building support for an actually good party, that’s the only way to save the country from fascism. Not voting for the Democrats.

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              25 days ago

              Let’s remember K.H. literally said she wanted to start a new war with Iran

              Citation fucking needed.

              she wanted the “most lethal army in the world”.

              That has been the explicit US policy of the US regardless of leadership for 80 years.

              If you think Harris and Trump are equally crazy, YOU are the one who needs psychological treatment. Trump literally wanted to nuke a hurricane, pulled us out of our nuclear deal with Iran, encouraged the US to develop and test “low yield” nuclear arms, and encouraged South Korea to build their own nukes. Harris along with Biden has simply continued the standard nuclear deterrent policy the US has followed for decades in spite of the first direct nuclear threat by another country since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

              • normal_user@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                About the first one, I guess it was actually Tim Walz that, when asked if he supported a preemptive strike on Iran, replied that Israel has a right to expand itself and that he would back Israel since it is a US ally unlike what he thinks Trump would do.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMIEaiS88pI

                And Tim Walz is who Kamala Harris chose as VP, so let’s not joke around and pretend Harris would have disagreed with any of this. The Democratic party was always the fascist party but with “the mask on” as opposed to the Republican Party which is “mask off”

                But also, while less literally, Harris did say that (and I’m quoting an article linked below):

                "Diplomacy is my preferred path to that end, but ALL OPTIONS are on the table,” she added.

                Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, also lambasted her opponent, Republican nominee and former US President Donald Trump, arguing that he was not tough enough toward the Iranian threat.

                “I am clear-eyed. Iran is a destabilizing and dangerous force,” Harris said. “When Donald Trump was president, he let Iran off the hook. After Iran and its proxies attacked US bases and American troops, Trump did nothing. And he pulled out of the nuclear deal without any plan, leading to an unconstrained Iranian nuclear program.”

                “On the other hand, our administration struck Iranian proxies in Iraq and Syria when they attacked American troops, and we are the first administration to ever directly defend Israel">

                https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/10/11/kamala-harris-vows-do-whatever-necessary-prevent-iran-acquiring-nuclear-weapons/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/harris-to-jewish-voters-all-options-on-the-table-to-stop-iran-from-going-nuclear/

                At the end of the part I quoted from the article she is literally celebrating about having strikes Iranian proxies already. Let’s remember that Israel striked an Iranian embassy, which is considered an act of war.

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_airstrike_on_the_Iranian_consulate_in_Damascus

                But kamala Harris has supported, is supporting and would have supported all of this, because she sees Israel as an important proxy of the US in the middle east. And the white house uses Israel to project it’s power against the Arabs countries and destabilize them. This is why she was never going to end the Genocide in Palestine.

                Also, your only excuse for the fact that she wanted the “most lethal army in the world”, is that the previous Dems also wanted this ( like obviously, she is from the same party as them, what I’m saying is that that is actively bad and should be a red line, an army should only be defensive, this is not what she was implying if you go back and listen to the DNC speech) and Republicans as well. Again, supporting 100% Hitler because another candidate is 101% Hitler is not that great of a talking point like you think it is. Actually on this particular issue both candidates are the same level of “Hitlerite”. That’s the party you support, and because you support it, you completely oppose the development of any 3rd party that would not have this crazy warmongering policy.

                To end for now my reply, a candidate that supports the foreign nuclear weapons policy the US followed in the past decades is actually a huge negative because the world has never been more tense (as you seem to notice as well in your comment). That policy is getting us closer to nuclear war and you think it’s good that Kamala Harris wanted to follow it !? Again, she is just being the fascist with the mask on, instead of being mask off like Trump.

                And just to remember you, I do not support Donald Trump, I never did and never will.

                • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  Walz supports Israel making a preemptive strike on Iran, not the US. At no point did he or Harris say they would use US troops in an offense against Iran.

                  The Democratic party was always the fascist party but with "the mask on

                  Not anywhere close to reality. The democratic party in no way meets the definition of fascism.

                  "Diplomacy is my preferred path to that end, but ALL OPTIONS are on the table,” she added.

                  So the same as literally every president ever.

                  he was not tough enough toward the Iranian threat.

                  He cozies up to all the dictators because he wants to be one, so yeah he wasn’t tough enough. He let them out of their treaty which was preventing their atomic weapons research. Keeping nukes out of the hands of an authoritarian theocracy is a good thing.

                  This is why she was never going to end the Genocide in Palestine.

                  Except she and Biden have been pushing for peace nonstop.

                  Meanwhile Trump said he would encourage Israel to “finish the job” which means kill them all.

                  an army should only be defensive

                  The best defense is to be the most lethal army so nobody wants to fight you. That has been US policy for BOTH parties since WW2. It’s a good policy because it keeps us out of wars.

                  That policy is getting us closer to nuclear war and you think it’s good that Kamala Harris wanted to follow it !?

                  The policy for Democrats in past decades has been mutual disarmament of nukes. Trump wants us building more.

                  Again, she is just being the fascist with the mask on, instead of being mask off like Trump.

                  Again, you need to look up the definition of fascism because Harris in no way meets it.

                  And just to remember you, I do not support Donald Trump, I never did and never will.

                  If you didn’t vote for Harris, you did support Trump.