Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-217 hours agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down18
arrow-up1146arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-217 hours agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squarewinterayars@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down7·11 hours agoIt’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
minus-squarebasmatilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·6 hours agoExcluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.
It’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
Excluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.