• dubious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    there aren’t always non-violent solutions. i accept that reality. it’s nothing to be proud of, but i would be ashamed if i couldn’t deal with that truth.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re correct, there aren’t always non-violent solutions, but those are often due to people who insist on engaging in violence, whether it be invading another country or taking offense at someone pulling into their driveway.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes. It only takes one party to initiate violence involving two parties.

        This is why it is necessary to be prepared for violence even if one never initiates violence.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m not sure what your point is. It is completely orthogonal to mine. In the same vein, no, you aren’t responsible for other people’s choices, and yes, rabid dogs (or people who act like them) are unlikely to listen to reason. Neither of those are good reasons to start fights, and that statement neither says that all fights are avoidable or that one mustn’t defend oneself.