• imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They already make us (is it makes only?) sign up for the draft

    One of the first things that pushed me hard to the left.

    Also having empathy.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      The draft is not conceptually bad. In the case of a national emergency, like Ukraine has had, having the organization for a draft ready if needed is a positive.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ukraine is a land invasion by an aggressive Russia, the US is one of the most geographically isolated countries in the world. We already subjugated our two neighbors so a land invasion is out of the question. Attack by sea? Good luck, we’re surrounded by a moat made up of two oceans guarded by a fleet of ships more advanced and numerous than any other country’s. The draft is there for us to project our imperial power to the world. The only viable use of the draft then is for a civil war but that would be risky if they bring saboteurs into the army’s ranks.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          My argument was in the abstract. Although one should never discount the possibility of the world changing, I’m inclined to agree that the US is unlikely to have a legitimate use for activating the draft with the world as it is now. But the draft, as a concept, is a tool that democratic governments are not wrong to hold onto in case of emergency.

          • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not sure I understand how forced service through a draft. Is any different than voluntary service when your country is being invaded?

            The draft implies you don’t get a choice in the matter. I really don’t understand anyone who thinks the psychology behind people who Don’t want to be soldiers being pushed into being soldiers is going to be a healthy army

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              There are numerous reasons why one wouldn’t volunteer, but still willingly serve in a draft. Many people feel obligation towards their family, and volunteering would be abrogating that responsibility. The draft removes that issue of internal guilt. Furthermore, drafts can preserve needed skills at home - in WW2, volunteers were often turned away and told to wait for their draft card to turn up, because at that moment their profession was needed for the war industry.

              I would highly recommend reading the accounts of soldiers who have been drafted in wars that weren’t wildly unpopular with the domestic population and/or 20 year occupations.

              In WW2, the vast majority of our military forces were drafted, both US and UK.

    • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m in favor of mandatory military service with almost no exceptions. My rationale is it would make conflict wildly unpopular if everyone had friends and family who would be directly affected.

      • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I encourage everyone to join, but I don’t think it should be mandatory because it is most definitely not for everyone. I also support the draft and I believe that women should also be compelled to register.

      • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah it worked so well during the draft, it sure changed a lot of people’s minds… Wait did it?

        Like, i w as being sarcastic but… Don’t think it really changed most people’s minds. It’s like abortion - everyone against abortion has their hypocritical - The only reasonable abortion is my abortion rule.

        I’m sure there’s got to be actual studies that were done backed during the American draft and probably in like current day S Korea and such places that have mandatory military service

        • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’d argue that the Vietnam draft did have a huge impact on the public reaction to the war. I think one of the reasons it didn’t have immediate political results is because affluent people (the kids of politicians) had many ways to avoid service, ie college or well known health excuses. I think if those loopholes were not in place the wide public backlash we saw would have been followed quickly by real political results.

          Obviously this is speculation, but there’s logic in there.

      • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Holy shit it’s you again, the guy from the styrofoam melting post like two posts up, having another weird overreaction

        May I interest you in “logging off”?

        • wagesj45@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s correct, though. The US does not register women in the Selective Service. They’re certainly able to join the military, but they are not counted in what human assets are available in a potential emergency.

          • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Correct, but the idea that the draft is a good thing because it counts the “able bodied fighting age men” is weird and sexist.

    • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not pass/fail. They test you on a bunch of different things and give you a percentile score per section and a percentile score overall. They use that to determine eligibility and which jobs you’d qualify and be best suited for. When I joined 20 years ago, you’re not getting in with less than a 35, but it’s probably a higher minimum score now.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s been factored into the analytics. They are looking for “compliant” personalities.

      Military recruitment tests are about finding the best soldiers NOT the brightest or most competent individuals.

    • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You WILL be put to work, citizen. Go ahead, get lower scores. Enjoy being cannon-fodder instead of controlling a drone from the safety of base camp. Draft dodger? Well…we have a special place for people like YOU.

      (Big /s, just following the idea through some of its logical steps)

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope, there would be provisions to exclude private schools. Despite Betsy fucking Devos literally funneling public school funds to private schools

  • polarpear11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    They made us take the ASFAB (sp?) I Christmas treed it and left. No consequences, no harassment from the military.

    • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A bunch of my classmates all got 99 on the ASVAB when we took it in high school. The recruiters didn’t bother talking to us for more than 5 minutes because they knew that we were not desperate enough to go into the military.

      The people they tended to target were in the 45-85 range.

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was thinking about going into the army. I took the test and got a 97. My options were nurse or truck driver. I declined to enlist.