Why consolidate communities?

One of the advantages of a decentralized platform like Lemmy is the ability to create parallel communities on the same topic. “You don’t like how a community is being moderated? Go to another instance and start your own community!” (with or without blackjack and hookers)

However, this is a double-edged sword. The creation of multiple communities on the same (or similar) topics can also fragment the userbase, leading to very sparsely populated communities.

A few perspectives in favour of consolidation: (click to expand)

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/11171955

I think until there’s some tool or system that helps collate all the information out here, fragmentation is detrimental to growth.

I’m not going to copy and paste the same comment with every mirrored post.

So sometimes commenting feels like a waste of time.

Centralizing helps ensure that there’s vibrant, consistent discussion which is what Lemmy should be about.

https://lemmy.ca/comment/8823953

I like this because people showing up to those communities might think that topic doesn’t have activity on Lemmy, when it actually does.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/8370860

I sometimes think that unmoderated communities should be closed, and just be left and locked with a pointer to the active one. In case an issue arises with the active one, they can still be unlocked and used as back up.

Credits to @Ashyr@sh.itjust.works, @otter@lemmy.ca, and @Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone

How consolidate communities?

While consolidating communities can counteract userbase fragmentation, it is not an easy process for users to do, and so I thought I’d write up and share this guide.

Taking inspiration from @popcar2@programming.dev’s excellent blogpost, let’s imagine a hypothetical scenario where the pancake userbase on Lemmy is heavily fragmented, could benefit from consolidation.

Step 1: Identify duplicates

Search lemmyverse.net/communities for ‘pancakes’, as well as common synonyms (hotcake, griddlecake, flapjack). In our hypothetical scenario, we get the following search results:

  • !pancakes@lemmya.net (active)
  • !pancakes@lemmyb.net (inactive)
  • !pancakes@lemmy.food (active)
  • !flapjacks@lemmya.net (inactive)

Open each community on its home instance, note the frequency of posts, and check whether the moderators are active. From this, you will often get a hunch for what might be the best community to consolidate to, but you should still keep an open mind as you proceed to the next step.

Edit1: To avoid centralization on large instances, I typically prefer consolidating towards smaller instances, provided that they are well managed.

Step 2: Solicit input

Create a post on !fedigrow@lemm.ee. The post should contain the following:

  1. A brief reminder on the detriments of userbase fragmentation and the advantages of consolidation.
  2. The list of duplicate communities you’ve identified for a given topic.
  3. An invitation for discussion and, optionally, your recommendation of a community to consolidate to.

Example post here (electric vehicles).

Once you have posted, create a top-level comment for each community in which you reach out to the moderators, administrators, and contributors for their opinions.

Example comments: (click to expand)

Paging !pancakes@lemmya.net active moderator @buckwheat_forever@lemmya.net

Would you be open to consolidating this community with one on another instance, perhaps !pancakes@lemmy.food?

Also paging active contributor @maple_syrup_or_die@lemmy.ca for their thoughts.

!pancakes@b.net moderator @spez_ruins_pancakes@lemmyb.net is inactive.

Paging admin @the_boss@lemmyb.net. Would you be open to consolidating this community with one on another instance, perhaps !pancakes@lemmy.food?

Paging !pancakes@lemmy.food moderator @cast_iron_queen@lemmy.food

How would you feel about a potential influx of posters and commenters from other instances? Would you be open to adding additional moderators, perhaps those who were active contributors or moderators in pancake communities on other instances?

These comments will hopefully spark discussion among the pancake enthusiasts on Lemmy.

Edit2: There will often be users advocating for consolidation to whichever community currently has the most subscribers/activity. When this community is on of the larger instances, feel free to gently remind people of the risks of centralization.

If any two communities agree to consolidate, you can move onto step 3.

Step 3: Consolidate communities

When a decision is reached between any two communities, one community can then be closed, and redirect users to the other. You should recommend that the moderator take the following actions:

Example comment: (click to expand)

Would you be able to do the following?

  1. Lock !pancakes@b.net by checking “Only moderators can post to this community”
  2. Create one final post on !pancakes@b.net announcing the consolidation to !pancakes@lemmy.food
  3. Rename the community to “[Dormant] moved to !pancakes@lemmy.food”

Changing the community display name is particularly helpful for users when they are searching for communities.

When to NOT consolidate communities?

If there exist two active communities on the same topic, and they have a different significant difference in geographical focus, political leanings, or moderation style, these communities should not be consolidated. This would be an example of the advantages of parallel communities in the Fediverse.

TL;DR:

  • Find all the communities on a given topic (easy)
  • Convince people that consolidation is a good idea (medium)
  • Get people, many of whom may be reluctant to see a community on their home instance locked, to decide on a which community to switch to (challenging)
  • Contact the moderators (or the admins, if the mods are inactive) of each of the n-1 communities and get them to lock each community, with appropriate links to the decided upon community (simple, but tedious)

It can be a bit of a pain-in-the-ass to do properly, and I’ve seen many more failures than successes, but given the potential benefit for the Fediverse as a whole, I thought I’d write up and share this guide. Feedback is welcome :)

  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    21·
    1 day ago

    I already asked you many times to not shield your opinions by arguing about what “other people do”.

    And you keep ignoring the fact that it’s still the reality. Nobody posts on !television@metacritics.zone , but it’s not against you, nobody posts on !Netflix@sopuli.xyz either.

    You keep ignoring that, and trying to scapegoat me as the cause of that, but I’m not preventing anyone posting to your communities, people just don’t, because they prefer more active communities, and active posters prefer established communities on established instances.

    And you seem perfectly fine making the effort to push consolidation around lemm.ee and even lemmy.film, but flat out refuse to extend any help to the topic-instances that I run.

    Yes, and you know that I’m building communities on other instances to promote decentralization

    The main difference between those admins and you is that they don’t come up aggressively to me like you usually do, and are doing right now.

    For people reading this: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39358768/17132379

    • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
      2·
      1 day ago

      You love to point out past discussions, but you only show half of the story. Where is the link to the post where we had more people (beyond me) saying “let’s post on soccer.forum instead of LW” and you refused? You preferred to continue on LW (even when you were basically alone posting by yourself there) and the best excuse you found was that you didn’t like the domain name. When I said “I can get a .football domain” (which I did, btw) you went then to say “oh, please don’t do that” and expressed some concern trolling about the cost of the domains.

      So, forgive me if I sound “aggressive”, but all I am doing is pointing out the inconsistencies between what you say you want and what you end up doing.

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        11·
        1 day ago

        At the time I was still building the community. As you pointed out, I was the only poster there.

        After a while, a few other people started posting there, one became mod, and we moved it to Lemm.ee

        Just because sometimes things take some time doesn’t mean I’m inconsistent.

        • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
          2·
          1 day ago

          At that time, there were more people posting on soccer.forum. This means that, if you had joined me and the others on soccer.forum, the network effects would grow in its favor.

          So, yeah, you could’ve helped me and the topic instances. You could have helped with decentralization a lot more than “moving from the first to the second largest instance”. But for some personal reason you refrained from it.

          And again, it’s fine if you don’t want to help, but don’t go around acting like your hands are tied.

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            1·
            1 day ago

            I scrolled soccer.forum all the way to 6 months ago and only found @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al as the other regular poster. Did I miss something?

            !Football@lemm.ee is 2 months old, so 6 months seems enough in the past to see what was happening back then.

            You could have helped with decentralization a lot more than “moving from the first to the second largest instance”.

            The best is the enemy if the good. Lemm.ee is a well managed instance, and still their first community in the most active ranking is 52th: https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active

            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alEnglish
              3·
              1 day ago

              Every once in a while I try and create activity over there, but it’s not getting any traction. Part of that is because !main@soccer.forum just doesn’t work conceptually. Especially with how communities federate out using the name as hashtags.

            • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
              2·
              1 day ago

              There are also some other people posting highlights via Mastodon.

              But it doesn’t matter if it was one or two people. One or two people are already more than the zero you had at LW.

              The best is the enemy if the good.

              Please, stop trying to rationalize your behavior. Your actions have already proven where your values and interests are, and where they are not.

              I’m not expecting to change your mind and I’m not expecting any form of cooperation from you anymore. All I’m asking of you now is to be honest and outright state that you simply are opposed to what anything I do, build or propose.

              • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alEnglish
                4·
                1 day ago

                I don’t think @Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com is the issue. The football community is a terrible example because it was kinda established and when it came to moving, everyone wanted to keep posting at football, so it was easy to transplant.

                I can see your vision, but I can see what Blaze is saying in that it’s better to work on one at a time than trying to make them all a success at once.

                • rglullis@communick.newsEnglish
                  2·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m not saying he is “an issue”. What I am saying is that he refused to help at every opportunity.

                  it’s better to work on one at a time than trying to make them all a success at once.

                  He is already actively promoting and posting more than a handful of communities on lemm.ee and others. The only communities where he consistently found justifications not to help are the ones I run.

                  To repeat: I am not demanding anything from him and I am not entitled to anyone’s goodwill. But if someone has any form of objection or issue with me or my work, I’d rather they make it explicit so that everyone else can evaluate for themselves than sticking with this eternal avoidance and non-committal position.

                  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alEnglish
                    2·
                    18 hours ago

                    Okay, so you own a couple instances I would like to see be successful for multiple reasons, but the point he’s trying to make is that no one is taking responsibility for them. There’s no regular posters. Long before anyone else can help, there needs to someone taking personal responsibility to post and make the community active, even on their own. That’s normally the admin since it’s their vested interest.

                    Now for football, you don’t care enough about football or pretty much any of the instances you host to make them active AS AN INTEREST. That’s not a slight on you, your passion is the stuff behind the scenes and I don’t think I’ve seen one of your instances go down, so you’re clearly epic at it. But what @blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com is suggesting is that you find someone to lead each instance as it was their baby. Someone who will post into the void until someone else joins in. And I agree, each instance, whether yours or someone else’s, needs someone to lead.

                    There’s of course exceptions to the rule, but given what you put in, you deserve success and to get that, there needs to be real content. If you post it, they will come! Get a stake holder to lead the charge on posting and others will join in. Well, I will at least.

                  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                    11·
                    1 day ago

                    To repeat: I am not demanding anything from him and I am not entitled to anyone’s goodwill. But if someone has any form of objection or issue with me or my work, I’d rather they make it explicit so that everyone else can evaluate for themselves than sticking with this eternal avoidance and non-committal position.

                    This comment is 6 months old: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/28718268/13761862

                    Not sure what is avoidant or non-committal about this

                    "My position is

                    • having too many instances managed by a single person is a high security risk. We see instances disappear regularly, usually it’s not a big deal because they are smaller instances, but currently, even if LW were to disappear, there are enough backup communities on other instances to keep going. It would be an issue, but the platform would recover
                    • My next suggestion was then indeed to have someone else helping rglullis with managing those instances
                    • based on the thread from 4 days ago, no admins has jumped in and offered to help: https://lemmy.world/post/20236330?scrollToComments=true

                    As a way to try to help him to get why people are not joining, I pointed out that

                    • relying on paid accounts with amounts such as 30€ per year while some instances have user costs as low as 0,11€ per month (so 3€ per year) https://lemmy.world/post/19466047 is unrealistic (and no, assuming that people browse Lemmy from “shiny iPhones” is not a reason: https://lemmy.world/comment/12172203)
                    • setting up an infrastructure that costs 1700 € per year on domain names alone is unreasonable (hence my comment to not buy a “football” domain name)
                    • having one small team per instance instead of a centralized consortium managing all of these instances seems healthier. The local team manages their instances, they make it grow organically, people see that the instance is reliable, they start trusting it and establish communities on it

                    I already due my due diligence when I choose an instance to host a community I post too. Rglullis do not pass this. I’m not avoiding saying no to him, I think they are a good sysadmin and do a good job, but they need a backup.

                    Hope that clarifies things a bit. "