• Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Ironic thing, we already tried this approach multiple times before, specially on war times. And each time humanity concluded that some knowledge has too high a price and we’re better off not finding out some things.

    Knowledge for the sake of knowledge, especially with a heavy blood cost, isn’t the way to progress as a species.

    And I should know, as a person greatly defined by curiosity about everything and more limited emotional capacity than other people due to mental limitations.

    • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you’re talking about unit 731 and the nazis then there was very little, if anything, scientifically valuable there.

      They had terrible research methodology that rendered what data they gathered mostly useless, and even if it wasn’t, most of the information could have been surmised by other methods. Some of the things they did served no conceivable practical or scientific purpose whatsoever.

      It was pretty much just sadism with a thin veneer of justification to buy them the small amount of legitimacy they needed to operate within their fascist governments.

      • Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Exactly. Society should never conflate knowledge driven by curiosity and knowledge as an excuse for sadism.

        There’s a difference between experimenting by following rules, and then observing the results vs giving in to base forbidden desires just to see what happens or trying to bend reality to confirm one’s bias - I mean, just look at how people tried to justify until decades ago a black person’s ‘inferiority’ and their discrimination by coming up with all sorts of anatomical observations. That’s the danger.

      • guldukat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        From what I read, a tiny bit of radiation and frostbite research was useful. Huge cost, of course, but minimally useful.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also the motivation of such research is usually not purely scientific, if at all, so the data gathered is often useless.

    • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You can critique him all you want but how in the world did you come to the conclusion that his and goals were knowledge for knowledge’s sake?

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I have problems with the doctors’ way of doing so, but their act was to allow an informed consenting(? it’s complicated) couple with an HIV-positive parent to have a child resistant to HIV. It was problematic, yes, but very different to the war crime experiments, much of which was simply about morbid curiosity and torture.

        • Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, comparing this to like the experiments of Mengele or Unit 731 definitely would be bordering on Holocaust denial/downplaying by comparing something like this, problematic issues withstanding, with those horrific abuses of humanity.