Zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgexternal-linkmessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up1976arrow-down12cross-posted to: freesoftware@lemmy.zipopensource@programming.devfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1974arrow-down1external-linkGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgZarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square201fedilinkcross-posted to: freesoftware@lemmy.zipopensource@programming.devfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.world
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 days agoI couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic. Which would you choose based on their website? Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
minus-squareknexcar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoYeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoYes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.
I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic.
Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
Yeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.