Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 14 hours agoImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1558arrow-down14
arrow-up1554arrow-down1imageImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareXyrelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agoDoctoress. Didn’t realize it was actually a word and feel like we should use it more because it’s awesome.
minus-squareBmeBenji@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·53 minutes agoIt does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
minus-squareXyrelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·35 minutes agoDefinitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.
Doctoress. Didn’t realize it was actually a word and feel like we should use it more because it’s awesome.
It does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
Definitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.