What’s your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

  • @FBJimmy
    link
    English
    6323 days ago

    Great to recognise this invention.

    I was surprised by the choice of ‘Mother of Wi-Fi’ though - Wi-Fi hasn’t used ‘frequency hopping’ as such since 802.11b was released back in 1999 - so very few people will have ever used frequency-hopping Wi-Fi.

    GPS only uses it in some extreme cases I think, but I’m not an expert.

    However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so ‘Mother of Bluetooth’ might have been more appropriate.

    • @sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7423 days ago

      So her invention isn’t used for Wifi now, but was used in the initial design of it? You might even say she helped give birth to it…

      • @FBJimmy
        link
        English
        45
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I guess my point is that it isn’t a particularly important part of the design of Wi-Fi - they included it in the very first iteration in 1997 and realised by 1999 they didn’t need it. Therefore Wi-Fi would likely have been born regardless of the invention; Bluetooth would not.

      • @VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 days ago

        Yeah but her work built on someone else’s so we’re taking it all away from her and calling them parents of her work so she gets nothing…

        Doesn’t feel as fun anymore, does it?

        Let the guys dad have some credit for his work, give her credit for her work - I don’t get what’s so controversial.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1623 days ago

      However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so ‘Mother of Bluetooth’ might have been more appropriate.

      Considering the namesake of Bluetooth, the “Mother of Bluetooth” sounds like the kind of person who would have a tea party with “Grendel’s Mother” from Beowulf.