If two people agree to a debate, but one of them participates in bad faith, and spends the majority of the time talking over the other, sidestepping virtually every point their counterpart makes, blatantly lies, employs personal insults and frequently airs irrelevant grievances, is it still considered a debate?

  • tobogganablaze
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think those are called “presidential debates” these days.